JOOLA Dynaryz CMD & ZGR Review: Exceeds Expectations
The new JOOLA Dynaryz rubbers are already out. They are improved versions of the first two Dynaryz rubber variants, and have been tweaked to suit more playstyles. The AGR and ACC versions sell well, and they offered extra speed and spin compared to the older Rhyzer and Rhyzm series.JOOLA stated that they have improved the topsheet formulation in order to have better ball grip while maintaining a fairly affordable price. The topsheet is not tacky as some other people say because it does not stick to your fingers nor the ball when you press against it, but it is extremely grippy. I believe these two new variants have more grip than the previous AGR and ACC variants.I will try to cover the differences between the ZGR and CMD rubbers and briefly compare them to the AGR and ACC versions. The sponge of both CMD and ZGR versions have a porous look and both seem to have a fairly similar porous size. Please take note I have not measured the pore sizes. The topsheets of the 2 rubbers have different specs and these give them their major differences. The CMD has a pimple height of 0.9mm, width of 1.7mm and spacing of 0.6mm between pimples. The ZGR has a pimple height of 0.8mm, width of 1.5mm and spacing of 0.9mm. The flat sheet of the CMD is thinner compared to that of the ZGR topsheet. You cannot have both tall pip structure and at the same time a thick flat sheet because it will go over the 4mm rubber thickness limit set by the ITTF. The thickness of both rubbers is at 3.7mm when I measured them with the caliper.This is the table for the pip structure of the four Dynaryz rubbers:
The ZGR and CMD variants are offensive+ rubbers. If I were to compare the speed of the ZGR to the ACC and the AGR, the ZGR seems to have the least speed. It is not slow, but you can feel the difference in speed. When I tested the four variants again side by side just to confirm the approximate speed, the CMD seems to have the “slowest” speed among the four. Based on JOOLA’s ratings, the ZGR’s speed is almost on par with the. In my opinion, the ACC seems to have more speed than the ZGR. There were times the Dynaryz ACC had greater distance to cover than the ZGR due to the lower arc of the ACC. If compared to other brands, the speed of the ZGR is greater than that of the Tenergy 05, but falls short to the Tenergy 64. The CMD version would be comparable to that of the Tenergy 80FX. The CMD’s speed is not as fast as the other variants, but the speed is still in the offensive range.PreviousNext
Disclaimer: These rubbers were sent to Yogi_Bear by JOOLA. This review is not paid and all views are his own. Review has been lightly edited for grammar and flow. You can find the original review, published on Table Tennis Daily, here.
Dynaryz Variant | Pimple Height | Pimple Width | Pimple Spacing |
CMD | 0.9mm | 1.7mm | 0.6mm |
ZGR | 0.8mm | 1.5mm | 0.9mm |
ACC | 0.9mm | 1.7mm | 0.6mm |
AGR | 0.9mm | 1.7mm | 0.6mm |
JOOLA Dynaryz ZGR
- Rubber Line: Premium
- Weight: 76 grams (uncut)
- Speed: OFF+
- Spin: Very High
- Hardness: Very Hard
JOOLA Dynaryz CMD
- Rubber Line: Premium
- Weight: 67 grams (uncut)
- Speed: OFF+
- Spin: Very High
- Hardness: Medium to Medium-Hard
Disclaimer: These rubbers were sent to Yogi_Bear by JOOLA. This review is not paid and all views are his own. Review has been lightly edited for grammar and flow. You can find the original review, published on Table Tennis Daily, here.
About Yogi_Bear
Known in the industry by his username, Yogi_Bear is a table tennis influencer, equipment expert, and frequent contributor on the table tennis forum Table Tennis Daily. He is an International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF) Level 1 Coach and ITTF Level 1 Coaching Course Conductor.Share:
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *